Condo proposal raises traffic concerns, 241 units would add to Westboro woes, residents say

19 01 2012

“Westboro residents had the opportunity to learn more about a proposed development for a site across Richmond Road from the Real Canadian Superstore at a public forum held on Jan. 11.

The building, which would be at 175 Richmond Rd., would be nine storeys tall at its highest point as proposed, with townhouses varying in height attached at the back. Along the Richmond Road frontage, there would also be commercial space…”

Read more over at the EMC website.





Annual General Meeting

16 01 2012

The Westboro Community Association’s AGM will be held Thursday February 9 from 7 to 9 p.m., upstairs at the Churchill Seniors Recreation Centre at 345 Richmond Road. Anyone is welcome to attend. More information will be forthcoming.

 





WVCA Public Forum on the Community Design Plan

16 01 2012

Community Design Plan: What does it say? How will it be implemented? Your chance to ask questions!

January 19, 2012
7 to 9 p.m.
St. George’s Church
Piccadilly Ave.

The Wellington Village Community Association is holding a public forum to explore the Wellington West Community Design Plan. We hope to better understand what the CDP calls for in terms of development heights and densities along Wellington Street, and how the City envisions implementing these policies.

Invited speakers include Councillor Katherine Hobbs, who will address how the community can be better involved in the planning approvals process, and Yasir Nagvi, who will explain his proposals for reforming the process of appealing development decisions to the Ontario Muncipal Board. City Planning Dept. staff will also speak.





Mothercraft needs volunteers!

19 12 2011

Mothercraft Ottawa has been chosen by the Sens Foundation as one of their charities for proceeds from ticket sales of the 50/50 draws. For more information, click here.





A letter from a neighbour: Mayor Watson, how ugly is Ottawa?

2 12 2011

An open letter to the Mayor

Dear Mr. Mayor,
We are among the quarter million of immigrants that Canada welcomes every year. We moved to Ottawa three years ago, as skilled labor, after having lived in Switzerland and Germany. And as all immigrants do, we compare our new home to our old home. Some things are wonderful about our new home. Many things are just different. And then there are a few things which are very disturbing. For example, ever since we came to Ottawa, we were wondering why Ottawa is ugly. Let there be no misunderstanding: Ottawa has a lot to offer for its residents. The quality of life is high. Green space and water abundant. Nature has been very generous to this city. But man has not. The man-made urban landscape is simply astonishingly unattractive: The few organically grown older neighborhoods are under siege by soulless and uniform “infills” (a term Europeans tend to associate with nasty dental procedures rather than architecture); poorly designed condo towers, not unlike those that were built in the 1970s all over the former Soviet Union, mushroom everywhere in the City; finding an example of decent architecture among the many cheap and thoughtless utilitarian buildings is hardly possible. The urban landscape of Ottawa is a cacophony; it is eclectic, unplanned, and largely untouched by even the slightest sense of esthetics in the public space. And sadly, the world is aware of this. Just read what the Wikipedia entry on “architecture in Ottawa” has to say.

Good architecture matters, Mr. Mayor! It matters, because you and I and everybody else want to live and work in a city which displays, occasionally, some sense of esthetics. But it also matters because an attractive urban landscape helps to attract and retain well-educated, creative people. When a city becomes too ugly, these people leave. And with that the tax base erodes. In today’s world, cities have to compete for the well-educated and mobile workforce, and an attractive urban landscape matters!

Over the last year or so, we have slowly uncovered what makes Ottawa’s urban landscape ugly. Here is how we learned: We live in a quiet residential street in Westboro. Across the street is an industrial site. When we bought our property we were aware of the fact that this site was zoned for residential buildings with a height of up to 19.5 meters. Sooner or later, we knew, a developer would build something. Then one day we heard that a developer had bought the property and intended to build apartment buildings. The height of these planned buildings was not 19.5 meters, not 29.5 meters, not 39.5 meters. The developer wanted to build twin towers with a height of 53.5 meters.

Of course, we were shocked and annoyed by the chutzpah of this developer. But we were not too concerned. You see, Mr. Mayor, in Europe, when a property is zoned for 19.5 meters, residents can be sure that the developers respect the zoning and by-laws. We call it legal security. Also, should the city intend to change the zoning laws, citizens have a say in this. We call it democracy. And when citizens are concerned about a development, they will ask their elected representative for support, and they will get it. We call it responsive government. Finally, in our home countries, there is a competent and impartial bureaucracy in place devoted to the public good. This we call good governance.

But apparently the developer that fancies a 53-meter twin tower in the heart of a neighborhood characterized by two-story building must have assumed that the planning process in Ottawa has no respect for legal security, democracy and good governance. Or why else would he have dared to put forward a proposal which so very clearly contradicts all planning rationales of the city of Ottawa, and which so blatantly ignores the public good for the sake of increasing profit margins?

But not only that. The planning rationale is full of inaccuracies, misleading claims, and plain nonsense. At times, it is so silly that it is actually funny. My favorite part is the claim that the shadows from a 53-meter tower have a less negative impact on adjacent properties than the shadows from a 19 meters high building. Also quite funny is the notion that privacy for neighbors is better ensured by 53-meter towers than by 19-meter buildings. Or how about the claim the twin towers would provide a sense of orientation to the community? How often do residents of Westboro get lost because they have no grotesquely megalomaniac twin towers to provide orientation, one wonders?

Then there is a traffic study (for which the developer paid, of course) which duly states that traffic from the new building will have no negative impact on the traffic situation in the neighborhood. The problem is that this study is methodologically so bizarrely flawed that every undergrad student would be ashamed to hand it in as a term paper.

Surely, no one could take such a planning rationale seriously, we thought. Everybody would understand that all these inaccuracies – no, let me rephrase this – all these silly little lies were just a desperate attempt of an unprofessional developer to build a case when there simply is no case.

But then, Mr. Mayor, a few months later, the City planner delivered his report on this proposal. Would you believe, Mr. Mayor, that the report almost verbatim repeated all the inaccuracies, factual mistakes, and the plain nonsense from the planning rationale? Yes, says the City planner, this proposal is in line with the planning rationales for Westboro (even though it takes three minutes to read the Richmond Road / Westboro Secondary Plan in order to find out that it is not). Yes, the traffic study is done in accordance with City of Ottawa regulations. Does the City regulate that traffic studies must be flawed? Yes, the shadows from the towers have a less negative impact on the neighborhood than shadows from a lower building. And so on.

After having read this report from the City planner, we were no longer annoyed. We were appalled and ashamed. Could it be that our friends and neighbors, who had warned us that the planning process in Ottawa is seriously corrupted, were right? We had refused to believe this. After all, we just immigrated to Canada, and as all immigrants, we want our new home to be something we have not to be ashamed of. We want it to be good.

Mr. Mayor, on December 5 the planning committee will vote on the proposal of Urban Uniform for a zoning by-law amendment proposal for 335 Roosevelt Ave, file Nr. D02-02-11-0068. If the planning committee says “yes” to this proposal, it will say “yes” to the greed of a few, and “no” to the public good. It will say “yes” to the profit margins of the investors, and “no” to the legitimate concerns of the many residents who live in the neighborhood, who raise families in the neighborhood, who pay taxes in the City of Ottawa, and who put their trust in the legal system of this city.

If the committee says “yes”, it will say “yes” to yet another uninspired, thoughtless, ugly and deeply provincial design whose sole purpose is profit maximizing. If the committee says “no”, it will send the developer back to the drawing board. There is no reason at all why a developer should not be able to come up with a design which conforms with the current zoning, and which is attractive for both old an new residents of the neighborhood. And if the current architect cannot do this, then find a decent architect who can. It is not hard.

But finally, and most importantly, Mr. Mayor, the planning committee will vote on something else, too. You know, the unattractive architecture of Ottawa is just the manifestation of something more profoundly and truly ugly: It is the manifestation of a deeply corrupted planning process. If the committee votes “yes”, it will further undermine the credibility of the bureaucracy. It will undermine the respect for its own rules and procedures. It will demonstrate what many citizens suspect: That decisions are made arbitrarily, and not in the interest of the public good. In sum, Mr. Mayor, if the committee says “yes”, it will undermine the very principles on which democratic communities rely: Trust in the rule of law, in democracy, and in accountable and transparent good governance.

The world needs more Canada! We new immigrants read this all over the city. Many of us came because we want to believe in this. Mr. Mayor, I continue to believe that the world needs more Canada. But then there are also some things which the world does not need. Which Canada does not need. Things of which all of us who live here in this community should be ashamed of. We should fix these things. On December 5th, there is an opportunity to start doing just that.

Sincerely,

Dr. Christoph Zürcher
378 Wilmont Avenue
Westboro

 





Westboro stitchers unite!

24 11 2011

If you use hooks or needles of any type to create crafts and would love to be able to do it in a group in a pleasant setting with good conversation, this might be the perfect thing for you!

Who: Anyone from beginners to advanced level who use hooks or needles to do crafts, such as knitting, crocheting, sewing, embroidering, tatting, beading…. you name it!

When: the last Sunday of every month

Where: Bridgehead at Richmond and Golden

Time: any time between 5 to 9 (closing time)

It will be a great opportunity to meet new people, hang out with those you already know, make some progress on a project or two, drink a good cup of coffee or tea, and maybe even learn a thing or two from others.

There is no need to RSVP.  Just show up when it best suits you and stay for as long as you want. There may be two or two dozen of us at any one time!

Please pass on the information to people you know in the area who you think might enjoy this kind of thing.  It is open to all.

The dates for the coming months will be:

  • November 27
  • January 29
  • February 26
  • March 25
  • April 28
  • May 26




Tricks and treats

26 10 2011

Join the merchants of Westboro Village on October 29, 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. for a day filled with chills and thrills, and spooktacular Halloween treats for the whole family! Read more about Wickedly Westboro on the Westboro BIA website.





Looking for development updates?

26 10 2011

We receive many requests for updates about the different developments going on in Westboro. The WCA maintains a special page to keep everyone informed, and it’s updated monthly. You can check it out here. Bookmark it for easy reference!





Fall Cleanup at Clare Gardens Park

6 10 2011

Saturday, October 22nd, 2011
10:30 am
(Rain date: October 23)

The WCA and the Volunteer Gardeners of Clare Gardens Park are hosting a fall clean-up.

We’ll bring rakes, plastic mitts, garbage and large garden bags. We recommend you bring gardening gloves and extra rakes.

It’s a great opportunity to hear the park news and ask questions. Tell us if you have any park-related concerns. We welcome your feedback!

Bring your families and meet some of your neighbours! Refreshments and goodies will be provided. See you in the park!

Organized by:

The Volunteer Gardeners of Clare Gardens Park
and the WCA

 

 





The Fendor meeting (335 Roosevelt)

28 09 2011

There’s an article about the meeting in today’s Ottawa Citizen:

Westboro residents jam hall to oppose highrise condos

“It’s the type of meeting that happens all of over the city, with increasing regularity: a developer presents plans for two condo towers where something much smaller used to be and the surrounding community doesn’t like it.

This time it was in Westboro, at 335 Roosevelt Ave., where Uniform Developments wants to build a pair of buildings, 14 and 16 storeys. Neighbouring residents say the city should deny the company’s application to rezone the land to allow buildings that tall. The condos will change the character of the neighbourhood, block out the sun for nearby homes and increase traffic, they say.”

(Read the rest online here.)

Were you at the meeting? We’d love to hear your feedback.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.